N.B. This post was written prior to me realising that the subject of the article should be of a legal topic in your research area and not just an interesting story.
Lawyers are often lambasted for being elitist, aloof and generally out of touch with 'normal society'. Those of the legal profession are increasingly becoming a stigmatised group, analogous to taxidermists or morticians, with 'lawyer jokes' being as numerous as the cliche individuals to whom the jokes inadvertently refer.
This stereotype has subsisted much to the chagrin of lawyers and it is clear from the core values purported by various law firms that the legal fraternity wishes to dispel these conceptions of being a 'weird' or 'bizaare' bunch. DLA Phillips Fox are a prime example of this, alleging to be a 'down to earth' organisation, seeking individuals with a 'sense of fun' for employment with the firm.
The contribution that leading wills and probate lawyer Dr. John de Groot makes to this argument is open for debate. Dr. de Groot has been reported as attempting to bring back the sport of goat racing as a nationwide competition through the donation of prize money for the race at his local fair.
See link:
http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/blogs/top_stories/archive/2010/04/29/lawyer-brings-back-goat-racing.aspx
He is quoted as saying:
"The humble goat was vital to the early settlers. They are among some of the hardest working animals and their hardy efforts are part of what helped Australia become a successful nation," he said.
"We hope the prize money will help revive the century-old sport and encourage more people to take it up."
Does Dr. de Groot's love for the commercialised racing of Australia's favourite horned friend support or detract from the perception of lawyers as a 'different species'?
It would seem that only time; and the public reaction and response to de Groot's recently published 'Memoirs of a Goat Racer and More' will tell...